No Report 1
have been easy prophet, in the conclusion of my previous post. The additional municipal income tax, the tax that puts his hands in the pockets of citizens in a more subtle, since the sampling is done automatically on the payroll, Fisciano was increased to fifty percent. In 2007 we will all pay one and half times what we paid last year. Not more than 0.4% but 0.6%. It 'as decided, laughable arguments, the majority of Amabile mayor, city council last Thursday.
I presented during the session, an amendment to maintain the same income tax rate last year. Rejected.
I submitted a second amendment to establish thresholds for exemption, as required by law and the municipal regulation, in favor of vulnerable groups, retired to a minimum sixty below € 10,750.00 and single-income families with at least two children under € 4250 per capita. Councillor Gary Barra has proposed an exemption for young people below a certain income threshold. Proposals rejected by even those who speak only instrumental in a defense of families and disadvantaged citizens. He then moved
ICI, already high at the highest rates (6 and 7 per thousand) from last year. Here, too, have said no to two of my amendments to reduce the ICI for the first 5 and 6 home that for rented houses with contracts duly registered (as was planned some years ago, when the municipal coffers before the advent of these politicians were still thriving, thanks to a careful evasion).
Only an increase of deductions for certain categories ICI was approved unanimously on a proposal, this time, the leader of the majority. We voted in favor of the majority because it is identical in substance to one of our other: but this curious history of the amendments of the majority. Even more curious, however, is that in the days before it was discussed in the council budget committee, attended as a representative Kite, and none of our proposals, including the latter, had been accepted by the majority, with arguments that, for political decency and love of our country, I prefer not to report. If our action has served to create an afterthought, even last minute, in the majority, if it served to get a result, as marginal and insignificant to the population, this is just a warning for us to do even better .
It 's a bit sad to conclude that it was not enough the 53% increase in tariff for waste, which was decided earlier this year to cover losses of Fisciano Development, but it was necessary, according to our wise administrators intervene in more massive in order to balance a budget that obviously no longer able to control for waste management and improvisation.
