Kayak Caspia Perception

This is a messy post ...

This is a messy post,

a squabble but not mine.

I never contrived

so lovely work.

The delay in the steps of the master plan of the town of Fisciano seems to have been scientifically programmed.
look at certain dates. The
May 14, 2004 the City Council approves the adoption and the first June 7 following public notice shall be given as per law. Start to run since then two months to submit any further comments, which expire on August 6 the same year.
In October, the minority directors request the convening of the Board to discuss the comments submitted. Only then will you find that the public communication was flawed because it also produced a newspaper with national circulation. On October 27, 2004 therefore you republish the notice of the adoption and begin to run again the two months allowed for comments. So the deadline hour slide to December 26, 2004. Meanwhile, the acts of the plan are sent to higher-level institutions for the opinions of competence (return to this shortly) and the City Council commits the administration to conclude quickly . Meanwhile, the first seven months have passed.
Subsequently, on June 17, 2005 is always the City Council to urge the Administration to conclude once again, this time in a very short time .
spent a few months the City Council and the Administration still committed to reaching the conclusion of an infinite process and tormented, even within fifteen days, but added, upon proposal by the majority leader, Tom Amabile, within fifteen days from the opinions requested the Government . Already advice. But they were not required the year before? And because the bodies do not respond?
In reality, the Government had responded, but only to complain about the lack of documents sent and ask for the necessary additions. Integrations that until then the City had looked good in the call. It is such that one of these organizations, the Basin Authority Destra Sele had requested additions since November 3, 2004 and the City sends only October 26, 2005, that is only after the matter had been highlighted by some minority councilors. Meanwhile
also expires the deadline provided by law for the final adoption of the plan ( September 2005) and finally the planning commission begins to consider the various comments submitted. This examination concludes with the meeting of December 12, 2005 , 12.30 , which inter alia states that, on the 20 observations which I made along with others, " needed a more thorough and careful investigation by the group work of the PRG " One glimmer of self-criticism? A willingness to discuss the public interest? None of this, only the 12.30 of December 12 about an hour and were presented the resignation of the Acting Mayor. The danger is averted, it will once again go to elections without plan, without rules, relying on the proven experience to say anything and promise everything.